Book a demo
Feedback
Overview
Analysis
Evaluation Created by Template
Loading...
Loading...
Question 1. How accurate is the pronunciation of this voice?
Single select | Scored | 5 radio buttons
Overall
MAX 5
Excellent - No errors in the pronunciations
4
Good - Mostly good, only minor errors
3
Fair - Some errors, but not bothering
2
Poor - Noticeable pronunciation errors, they are bothering
MIN 1
Bad - Many of the pronunciations are not correct
MAX 5
Excellent - No errors in the pronunciations
4
Good - Mostly good, only minor errors
3
Fair - Some errors, but not bothering
2
Poor - Noticeable pronunciation errors, they are bothering
MIN 1
Bad - Many of the pronunciations are not correct
Models
Cartesia
ElevenLabs
Inworld
Minimax
Resemble
MAX 5
Excellent - No errors in the pronunciations
4
Good - Mostly good, only minor errors
3
Fair - Some errors, but not bothering
2
Poor - Noticeable pronunciation errors, they are bothering
MIN 1
Bad - Many of the pronunciations are not correct
Evaluator
Geo
Evaluator
Age
Evaluator
Gender
Graph 1
4.50
4.86
4.77
4.82
3.77
+-1
All regions
+-1
All ages
+-1
All genders
Add tags to compare
MAX 5
Excellent - No errors in the pronunciations
4
Good - Mostly good, only minor errors
3
Fair - Some errors, but not bothering
2
Poor - Noticeable pronunciation errors, they are bothering
MIN 1
Bad - Many of the pronunciations are not correct
MAX 5
Excellent - No errors in the pronunciations
4
Good - Mostly good, only minor errors
3
Fair - Some errors, but not bothering
2
Poor - Noticeable pronunciation errors, they are bothering
MIN 1
Bad - Many of the pronunciations are not correct
Tags
Answers
5. Excellent - No errors in the pronunciations
4. Good - Mostly good, only minor errors
3. Fair - Some errors, but not bothering
2. Poor - Noticeable pronunciation errors, they are bothering
1. Bad - Many of the pronunciations are not correct
Cartesia
ElevenLabs
Inworld
Minimax
Resemble
15 (68.18%)
4 (18.18%)
2 (9.09%)
1 (4.55%)
0 (0.00%)
19 (86.36%)
3 (13.64%)
0 (0.00%)
0 (0.00%)
0 (0.00%)
17 (77.27%)
5 (22.73%)
0 (0.00%)
0 (0.00%)
0 (0.00%)
18 (81.82%)
4 (18.18%)
0 (0.00%)
0 (0.00%)
0 (0.00%)
7 (31.82%)
7 (31.82%)
6 (27.27%)
0 (0.00%)
2 (9.09%)
Deep analysis
Distribution
Mean
Files
5. Excellent - No errors in the pronunciations
4. Good - Mostly good, only minor errors
3. Fair - Some errors, but not bothering
2. Poor - Noticeable pronunciation errors, they are bothering
1. Bad - Many of the pronunciations are not correct
MAX 5
4
3
2
MIN 1
MAX 5
4
3
2
MIN 1
Models: All models
Tags
Filename
Model
Tags
Statistics
x̅
CI
σ
x̅
00:00
--:--
reference-jade-hardy_xctBDUrAL6PMo7AN3Ck7 (1).mp3
ElevenLabs
x̅
4.86
CI
0.16
σ
x̅
0.07
00:00
--:--
miminax-jade_us_en_jade_1211_01.mp3
Minimax
x̅
4.82
CI
0.18
σ
x̅
0.08
00:00
--:--
cartesia-jade-hardy_0d54efe8-040a-4954-80e8-562aea53eab9 (1).mp3
Cartesia
x̅
4.50
CI
0.38
σ
x̅
0.18
00:00
--:--
inworld-jade_default-qzylvcagdd3xfawrzormtq__jade_20260219.mp3
Inworld
x̅
4.77
CI
0.19
σ
x̅
0.09
00:00
--:--
resemble-jade.mp3
Resemble
x̅
3.77
CI
0.53
σ
x̅
0.25
1
Question 2. How much does this voice sound like spoken by a real human voice actor?
Single select | Scored | 5 radio buttons
Overall
MAX 5
Excellent - They sound like spoken by a human voice actor
4
Good - Mostly natural, only minor synthetic elements
3
Fair - Some unnatural elements
2
Poor - Noticeable unnatural elements, difficult to perceive as human
MIN 1
Bad - Very robotic
MAX 5
Excellent - They sound like spoken by a human voice actor
4
Good - Mostly natural, only minor synthetic elements
3
Fair - Some unnatural elements
2
Poor - Noticeable unnatural elements, difficult to perceive as human
MIN 1
Bad - Very robotic
Models
Cartesia
ElevenLabs
Inworld
Minimax
Resemble
MAX 5
Excellent - They sound like spoken by a human voice actor
4
Good - Mostly natural, only minor synthetic elements
3
Fair - Some unnatural elements
2
Poor - Noticeable unnatural elements, difficult to perceive as human
MIN 1
Bad - Very robotic
Evaluator
Geo
Evaluator
Age
Evaluator
Gender
Graph 1
3.41
4.23
4.05
4.09
3.18
+-1
All regions
+-1
All ages
+-1
All genders
Add tags to compare
MAX 5
Excellent - They sound like spoken by a human voice actor
4
Good - Mostly natural, only minor synthetic elements
3
Fair - Some unnatural elements
2
Poor - Noticeable unnatural elements, difficult to perceive as human
MIN 1
Bad - Very robotic
MAX 5
Excellent - They sound like spoken by a human voice actor
4
Good - Mostly natural, only minor synthetic elements
3
Fair - Some unnatural elements
2
Poor - Noticeable unnatural elements, difficult to perceive as human
MIN 1
Bad - Very robotic
Tags
Answers
5. Excellent - They sound like spoken by a human voice actor
4. Good - Mostly natural, only minor synthetic elements
3. Fair - Some unnatural elements
2. Poor - Noticeable unnatural elements, difficult to perceive as human
1. Bad - Very robotic
Cartesia
ElevenLabs
Inworld
Minimax
Resemble
3 (13.64%)
8 (36.36%)
7 (31.82%)
3 (13.64%)
1 (4.55%)
8 (36.36%)
11 (50.00%)
3 (13.64%)
0 (0.00%)
0 (0.00%)
7 (31.82%)
9 (40.91%)
6 (27.27%)
0 (0.00%)
0 (0.00%)
7 (31.82%)
11 (50.00%)
3 (13.64%)
1 (4.55%)
0 (0.00%)
3 (13.64%)
5 (22.73%)
8 (36.36%)
5 (22.73%)
1 (4.55%)
Deep analysis
Distribution
Mean
Files
5. Excellent - They sound like spoken by a human voice actor
4. Good - Mostly natural, only minor synthetic elements
3. Fair - Some unnatural elements
2. Poor - Noticeable unnatural elements, difficult to perceive as human
1. Bad - Very robotic
MAX 5
4
3
2
MIN 1
MAX 5
4
3
2
MIN 1
Models: All models
Tags
Filename
Model
Tags
Statistics
x̅
CI
σ
x̅
00:00
--:--
reference-jade-hardy_xctBDUrAL6PMo7AN3Ck7 (1).mp3
ElevenLabs
x̅
4.23
CI
0.30
σ
x̅
0.15
00:00
--:--
miminax-jade_us_en_jade_1211_01.mp3
Minimax
x̅
4.09
CI
0.36
σ
x̅
0.17
00:00
--:--
cartesia-jade-hardy_0d54efe8-040a-4954-80e8-562aea53eab9 (1).mp3
Cartesia
x̅
3.41
CI
0.47
σ
x̅
0.22
00:00
--:--
inworld-jade_default-qzylvcagdd3xfawrzormtq__jade_20260219.mp3
Inworld
x̅
4.05
CI
0.35
σ
x̅
0.17
00:00
--:--
resemble-jade.mp3
Resemble
x̅
3.18
CI
0.49
σ
x̅
0.23
1
Question 3. How relevant is the tone for customer service?
Single select | Scored | 5 radio buttons
Overall
MAX 5
Excellent
4
Good
3
Fair
2
Poor
MIN 1
Bad
MAX 5
Excellent
4
Good
3
Fair
2
Poor
MIN 1
Bad
Models
Cartesia
ElevenLabs
Inworld
Minimax
Resemble
MAX 5
Excellent
4
Good
3
Fair
2
Poor
MIN 1
Bad
Evaluator
Geo
Evaluator
Age
Evaluator
Gender
Graph 1
3.50
4.41
4.23
4.36
3.59
+-1
All regions
+-1
All ages
+-1
All genders
Add tags to compare
MAX 5
Excellent
4
Good
3
Fair
2
Poor
MIN 1
Bad
MAX 5
Excellent
4
Good
3
Fair
2
Poor
MIN 1
Bad
Tags
Answers
5. Excellent
4. Good
3. Fair
2. Poor
1. Bad
Cartesia
ElevenLabs
Inworld
Minimax
Resemble
2 (9.09%)
12 (54.55%)
4 (18.18%)
3 (13.64%)
1 (4.55%)
10 (45.45%)
11 (50.00%)
1 (4.55%)
0 (0.00%)
0 (0.00%)
8 (36.36%)
11 (50.00%)
3 (13.64%)
0 (0.00%)
0 (0.00%)
10 (45.45%)
10 (45.45%)
2 (9.09%)
0 (0.00%)
0 (0.00%)
2 (9.09%)
12 (54.55%)
6 (27.27%)
1 (4.55%)
1 (4.55%)
Deep analysis
Distribution
Mean
Files
5. Excellent
4. Good
3. Fair
2. Poor
1. Bad
MAX 5
4
3
2
MIN 1
MAX 5
4
3
2
MIN 1
Models: All models
Tags
Filename
Model
Tags
Statistics
x̅
CI
σ
x̅
00:00
--:--
reference-jade-hardy_xctBDUrAL6PMo7AN3Ck7 (1).mp3
ElevenLabs
x̅
4.41
CI
0.26
σ
x̅
0.13
00:00
--:--
miminax-jade_us_en_jade_1211_01.mp3
Minimax
x̅
4.36
CI
0.29
σ
x̅
0.14
00:00
--:--
cartesia-jade-hardy_0d54efe8-040a-4954-80e8-562aea53eab9 (1).mp3
Cartesia
x̅
3.50
CI
0.45
σ
x̅
0.22
00:00
--:--
inworld-jade_default-qzylvcagdd3xfawrzormtq__jade_20260219.mp3
Inworld
x̅
4.23
CI
0.30
σ
x̅
0.15
00:00
--:--
resemble-jade.mp3
Resemble
x̅
3.59
CI
0.40
σ
x̅
0.19
1
